¶1Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
¶2Concur: EDWARD T. BARTLETT, VANN, WILLARD BARTLETT and HISCOCK, JJ. Dissenting: CULLEN, Ch. J., and GRAY, J. Absent: WERNER, J.
194 N.Y. 521
Mott v. . Mott
Decided January 5, 1909
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 1915
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1909-01-05
View the full empirical analysis of this case →