Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 194 Okla. 440 - Demoss v. Rule

Demoss v. Rule’s Empirical Analysis

1944

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
April 1967
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently April 1967

7 state decisions

40194419501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hedges v. Dixon County · York v. Trigg · Phelan v. Roberts · Cassidy v. Gould · Lewis v. Schafer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Fraud, actual or constructive, is an essential element in the creation or existence of a constructive trust. Actual or intentional fraud is not necessary. A constructive trust will arise whenever the circumstances under which property was acquired make it inequitable that it should be retained by him who holds the legal title as against another, provided some confidential relation exists between the two, and providing that raising a trust is necessary to prevent failure of justice.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.