Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 194 Okla. 632 - Lewis v. Couch

Lewis v. Couch’s Empirical Analysis

1944

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
April 1999
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently April 1999

8 state decisions

30194419501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Throckmorton · Pico v. Cohn · Bleakley v. Barclay · McIntosh v. Holtgrave · Laithe v. McDonald

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A petition to vacate a judgment for fraud practiced by the successful party in obtaining the judgment is authorized by 12 O.S.1941 § 1031, subd. 4, and is in the nature of an independent action.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.