Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 194 P.3d 1000 - State v. Applegate

State v. Applegate’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
December 2014
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Blakely v. Washington · 115 Wash. 2d 60 - State v. Camarillo · 154 Wash. 2d 118 - State v. Hughes · State v. Pillatos · 94 Wash. 2d 1 - State v. Martin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “that the offenses were part of an ongoing pattern of domestic violence, were part of an ongoing pattern of sexual abuse, and resulted in the pregnancy of one of the child victims.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “)... [which] authorized trial courts to impanel juries to consider aggravating factors supporting exceptional sentences.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Legislature enacted former RCW 9.94A.537 (Laws of 2005, ch. 68, § 1) (known as the " Blakely fix”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.