Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 194 SO 67 - Williams v. Brocato

Williams v. Brocato’s Empirical Analysis

1940

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
October 1975
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Farley v. Frost-Johnson Lumber Co. · Boubede v. Aymes · Campbell v. Woolfolk · Kirsch v. Broas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It has long been held by the courts of this state that one cannot claim, judicially, the proceeds of a sale and afterwards attack that sale for nullity. The demand for the proceeds is the judicial admission of the legality of the sale and the declaration which one makes in a judicial proceeding is full proof against him.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.