194 So. 2d 649 - Thompson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently April 1999
1 federal appellate · 11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 78 Ga. App. 153 - Loomis v. State · 51 So. 2d 494 - Stewart v. State · United States v. Foster · 111 Tex. Crim. 570 - Leahy v. State · 148 Tex. Crim. 372 - Foster v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Right to appear in person and by counsel. Ordinarily accused must either conduct his own defense or be represented by counsel and cannot combine both; accused has no right to be heard both in person and by attorney; where he is conducting his own defense, he has no right to have an attorney speak for him and he is not entitled to speak for himself where he is represented by counsel. However, the trial court may, in its discretion, permit an accused represented by counsel to participate in the conduct of the case, or permit an accused appearing in propria persona to employ an attorney to sit by and advise him during the presentation of his case, or may even appoint an attorney, with the attorney's consent, to render advisory services to an indigent accused wishing to represent himself. Under some constitutional provisions accused is entitled to be heard by himself, or counsel, or both. Under such a constitutional provision the right of accused to speak for himself when he is represented by counsel is subject to restriction by the trial court in the exercise of its power to prescribe the manner in which the business of the court is conducted.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Salser v. State · Young v. State“"In all criminal prosecutions the accused shall ... have the right ... to be heard in person, by counsel OR BOTH." Art. I § 16 Fla. Const. (emphasis supplied.)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Accused ... shall be heard by himself, or counsel, or both.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Young v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.