Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 194 SO3D 980 - Pickering v. State

Pickering v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2015

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Agurs · Napue v. People of the State of Illinois · California v. Trombetta · Arizona v. Youngblood · Killian v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'To meet this standard of constitutional materiality ... evidence must both possess an exculpatory value that was apparent before the evidence was destroyed, and be of such a nature that the defendant would be unable to obtain comparable evidence by other reasonably available means.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The presence or absence of bad faith by the police for purposes of the Due Process Clause must necessarily turn on the police's knowledge of the exculpatory value of the evidence at the time it was lost or destroyed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “" Ex parte Gingo , 605 So.2d 1237 , 1240-41 (Ala. 1992).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.