Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 194 S.W.3d 595 - Beedy v. State

Beedy v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
October 2017
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 23rd Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Boykin v. State · McNew v. State · Ramos v. State · LaPorte v. State · Brown v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An abuse of discretion generally will be found only if (1) the trial court imposes consecutive sentences when the law requires concurrent sentences, (2) the trial court imposes concurrent sentences when the law requires consecutive ones, or (3) the trial court otherwise fails to observe the statutory requirements pertaining to sentencing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.