Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 194 U.S. 48 - Minnesota v. Northern Securities Co.

Minnesota v. Northern Securities Co.’s Empirical Analysis

194 U.S. 48 · 1904

Citation profile

535
cited by 535 later decisions
53
cited 53 times by the Supreme Court
12
states following
June 2024
most recently cited

181 federal appellate · 95 district · 31 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 535 later decisions (53 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2024 · most notably Ex Parte: Edward T Young (1908), Delaware v. Van Arsdall (1986)

181 federal appellate · 95 district · 31 state decisions — followed in 12 states

9801904191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pennoyer v. Neff · Mansfield Ry Co v. Swan · Osborn v. President Directors and Company of the Bank of the United States · Cohens v. Virginia · In re Debs

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 535 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “only prescribes a rule by which courts, Federal and state, are to be guided when a question arises in the progress of a pending suit as to the faith and credit to be given by the court to the public acts, records, and judicial proceedings of a State other than that in which the court is sitting.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “arises under the Constitution, laws or treaties of the United States.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““These eases establish, beyond further question in this court, the rule that, under existing statutes regulating the jurisdiction of the courts of the United States, a case cannot be removed from a state court, as one arising under the Constitution or laws of the United States, unless the plaintiff’s complaint, bill or declaration shows it to be a case of that character. ‘If it does not appear at the outset,’ this court has quite recently said, ‘that the suit is one of whieh the Circuit Court at the time its jurisdiction is invoked could properly take cognizance, the suit must be dismissed.’ ””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.