¶1 (dissenting) — In my opinion, the trial court properly established the so-called Dohm line as the true boundary, and I accordingly dissent from the reversal of the judgment on respondent’s cross-appeal.
194 Wash. 608
82 P.2d 793
Large v. Shively
Decided May 9, 1938
Washington Supreme Court · decided 1938-05-09
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1938-05-09
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently August 1997
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →