Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 194 W. Va. 544 - State v. Buzzard

194 W. Va. 544 - State v. Buzzard’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
4
states following
October 2016
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently October 2016

24 state decisions

120199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Terry v. Ohio · Katz v. United States · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · United States v. Matlock

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Searches conducted outside the judicial process, without prior approval by judge or magistrate, are per se unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment and Article III, Section 6 of the West Virginia Constitution — subject only to a few specifically established and well-delineated exceptions. The exceptions are jealously and carefully drawn, and there must be a showing by those who seek exemption that the exigencies of the situation made that course imperative.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “[T]here is no authority ... that upon appellate review, we should consider the ... testimony at trial in upholding the trial court's ruling which arose out of the pre-trial suppression hearing”); State v. Farley, 192 W.Va. 247 , 253-54 n.7, 452 S.E.2d 50 , 56-57 n.7 (1994) (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “Whether a consent to search is in fact voluntary or is the product of duress or coercion, express or implied, is a question of fact to be determined from the totality of all the circumstances.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.