Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 194 W. Va. 740 - State v. Beard

194 W. Va. 740 - State v. Beard’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
7
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

2 district · 35 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently January 2019 · most notably Connecticut v. Porter (1997), 195 W. Va. 512 - Gentry v. Mangum (1995)

2 district · 35 state decisions

170199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Kastigar v. United States · Sherman v. United States · Frye v. United States · Commissioner v. Engle

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “because it does not assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “scientific, technical, or specialized knowledge.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “In analyzing the admissibility of expert testimony under Rule 702 of the West Virginia Rules of Evidence, the trial court's initial inquiry must consider whether the testimony is based on an assertion or inference derived from the scientific methodology. Moreover, the testimony must be relevant to a fact at issue. Further assessment should then be made in regard to the expert testimony's reliability by considering its underlying scientific methodology and reasoning. This includes an assessment of (a) whether the scientific theory and its conclusion can be and have been tested; (b) whether the scientific theory has been subjected to peer review and publication; (c) whether the scientific theory's actual or potential rate of error is known; and (d) whether the scientific theory is generally accepted within the scientific community.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.