Johnson v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
1963
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently May 2009
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Kephart v. Kephart · Thomas F. Lundregan v. Mrs. G. Jeannette Lundregan · Suber v. Suber · Richards v. Richards · Maran v. Maran
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“neither offered to pay the arrearages nor presented evidence upon which the court could predicate a finding that he was justified in failing to comply” with the support order. 195 A.2d at 407. Similarly, in Súber, we ruled that the”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Wagley v. Evans
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.