Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 195 A3D 18 - Flowers v. State

Flowers v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
2
states following
June 2022
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Graham v. Connor · United States v. Mendenhall · United States v. Cortez · Adams v. Williams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Generally, a show of force, including the use of drawn weapons, does not render an investigative stop unreasonable if the police determine that it is reasonably necessary to protect themselves and maintain the status quo. ... Similarly, forcing a detainee to lie down to prevent flight might be justified under the circumstances.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “a seizure has occurred under Article I, § 6 of the Delaware Constitution requires focusing upon the police officer's actions to determine when a reasonable person would have believed he or she was not free to ignore the police presence”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “When the Covington officers stopped Hensley, they were authorized to take such steps as were reasonably necessary to protect their personal safety and to maintain the status quo during the course of the stop.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.