Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 195 A3D 588 - Commonwealth v. Crissman

Commonwealth v. Crissman’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
August 2023
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Fuller v. United States · Commonwealth v. Walker · Commonwealth v. Tarver · Commonwealth v. Frisbie · Commonwealth v. Baldwin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “No crimes shall merge for sentencing purposes unless the crimes arise from a single criminal act and all of the statutory elements of one offense are included in the statutory elements of the other offense. Where crimes merge for sentencing purposes, the court may sentence the defendant only on the higher graded offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) the crimes arise from a single criminal act; and (2) all of the statutory elements of one of the offenses are included in the statutory elements of the other offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.