Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

195 A.D.2d 605

People v. Amaker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1993-07-26

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently January 2014

2 federal appellate ·

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1993-07-26

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Juviler, J.), rendered October 30, 1989, convicting him of murder in the second degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

¶2Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

¶3The defendant alleges that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel. We disagree. Viewing the evidence, the law, and the circumstances of the case in totality, we find that the defendant was provided with meaningful representation (see, People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 146-147; People v Satterfield, 66 NY2d 796).

¶4The defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]), and, in any event, are without merit. Bracken, J. P., Balletta, Lawrence and Copertino, JJ., concur.

/195/ad2d/605 · .json · Public domain