Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

195 A.D.3d 956

People v. Wright

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 2021-06-23

Applies NY JUD § 431

Decided 2021-06-23

People v Wright (2021 NY Slip Op 04039)
People v Wright
2021 NY Slip Op 04039
Decided on June 23, 2021
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on June 23, 2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
HECTOR D. LASALLE, P.J.
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
ROBERT J. MILLER
COLLEEN D. DUFFY
PAUL WOOTEN, JJ.

2020-00620
(Ind. No. 763/19)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Timothy Wright, appellant.




¶1Salvatore C. Adamo, New York, NY, for appellant.

¶2Timothy D. Sini, District Attorney, Riverhead, NY (Edward A. Bannan of counsel), for respondent.



¶3DECISION & ORDER

¶4Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (William J. Condon, J.), rendered November 22, 2019, convicting him of robbery in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

¶5ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

¶6Contrary to the defendant's contention, he was not deprived of the effective assistance of counsel (see Strickland v Washington , 466 US 668; People v Benevento , 91 NY2d 708).

¶7The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte , 90 AD2d 80).

¶8LASALLE, P.J., CHAMBERS, MILLER, DUFFY and WOOTEN, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

¶9Aprilanne Agostino

¶10Clerk of the Court



/195/ad3d/956 · .json · Public domain