Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 195 Ark. 621 - Dial v. Armstrong

Dial v. Armstrong’s Empirical Analysis

1938

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
2
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently May 2018 · most notably Ueltzen v. Roe (1967), Gibbs v. Pace (1944)

24 state decisions

80193819401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Fulcher v. Dierks Lumber & Coal Co. · Shirey v. Whitlow · Terral v. Brooks · Waller v. Dansby · Britt v. Berry

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““And it is true that it having been shown that Brooks entered into the permissive possession of the land, the presumption is that his subsequent possession and that of those claiming under him was in subordination to the church’s title and pursuant to this permission. But this presumption may be overthrown by the evidence, and the jury should find that it was overthrown, and that the possession was adverse, if they should find the fact to be that the trustees of the church had actual notice of this adverse possession, or that defendants’ occupancy had been so inconsistent with the presumption of a permissive possession as to impute knowledge to the trustees of that hostility.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““The rule is that where the entry is permissive the statute will not begin to run against the legal owner until an adverse holding is declared, and notice of such change is brought to the knowledge of the owner.” ,(citing cases)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.