In Re Cornelius’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently May 2018 · most notably In Re: Luisa Anes (1999), Baud v. Carroll (2011)
3 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Relies on In the Matter of Robert John Love, Debtor-Appellant · Hagel v. Drummond (In Re Hagel) · In Re Schnabel · In Re Cavanaugh · In Re Powers
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) whether the debtor has few or no unsecured creditors; (2) whether there has been a previous petition filed by the debtor or a related entity; (3) whether the debtor’s conduct pre-petition was proper; (4) whether the petition permits the debtor to evade court orders; (5) whether the petition was filed on the eve of foreclosure; (6) whether the foreclosed property is the sole or major asset of the debtor; (7) whether the debtor’s income is sufficient such that there is a likely possibility of reorganization; (8) whether the reorganization essentially involves the resolution of a two party dispute, and (9) whether the debtor filed solely to obtain the protection of the automatic stay.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“not reasonably necessary to be expended for the maintenance or support of the debtor or a dependent of the debtor . . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re: Luisa Anes
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.