Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 195 Colo. 110 - People v. Stage

People v. Stage’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

47
cited by 47 later decisions
2
states following
May 2011
most recently cited

47 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently May 2011 · most notably People v. Saars (1978), R.Mcg. v. J.W. (1980)

47 state decisions

18019781980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Broadrick v. Oklahoma · National Association for Advancement of Colored People v. Y Button · Dombrowski v. Pfister · Bigelow v. Virginia · Lewis v. City of New Orleans

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Any person who knowingly lives on or is supported or maintained in whole or in part by money or other thing of value earned, received, procured, or realized by any other person through prostitution commits pimping, which is a class 5 felony.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “We do not examine the outer bounds of statutes where the alleged conduct falls clearly within the statute's prohibition. While, as suggested by the defendants, doubts as to the applicability of the statutory language in marginal fact situations may be conceived, we think the statute gives defendants adequate warning that their [conduct] was a criminal offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “a person to whom a statute may constitutionally be applied will not be heard to challenge that statute on the ground that it may conceivably be applied unconstitutionally to others, in other situations not before the Court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.