¶1This case involves an appeal from a denial, allegedly without a hearing, of a motion for accelerated rehabilitation. Since the nonappealability of this ruling is governed by our decisions in State v. Parker, 194 Conn. 650, 485 A.2d 139 (1984), and State v. Spendolini, 189 Conn. 92, 454 A.2d 720 (1983), no further explication is necessary.
¶2Appeal dismissed.
¶3In this opinion Peters, C. J., Parskey, Shea and Dannehy, Js., concurred.