Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 195 F.1d 113 - Sully v. United States

Sully v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

195 F. 113 · 1912

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
2
states following
March 2010
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently March 2010

9 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions

4019121920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hy-Yu-Tse-Mil-Kin v. Philomme Smith · Lytle v. the State of Arkansas · United States ex rel. West v. Hitchcock · Waldron v. United States · Ligon v. Johnston

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““That all persons wlio are in whole or in part of Indian blood, or 'descent, who are entitled to an allotment of land under any law of Congress, or who claim to be so entitled to land under any allotment act, or any grant made by Congress, or who claim to have been unlawfully denied or excluded from any allotment or any parcel of land, to which they claim to be lawfully entitled by virtue of any act of Congress, may commence and prosecute or defend, any action, suit or proceeding in relation to their rights .thereto, in the proper Circuit Court of the United States; and said Circuit Courts are hereby given jurisdiction to try and determine any action, suit or proceeding arising within their respective jurisdictions, involving the right of any person, in whole or in part of Indian blood or descent, to any allotment of land under any law or treaty; and the judgment or decree of any such Court in favor of any claimant to an allotment of land shall have the same effect when properly certified to the Secretary of the Interior, as if such allotment had been allowed and approved by him.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.