Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 195 F.1d 322 - In re Casey

In re Casey’s Empirical Analysis

195 F. 322 · 1912

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
December 1941
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 5 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently December 1941

4 federal appellate · 5 district ·

501912192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Noble v. Union River Logging Railroad · Reynolds v. Stockton · Decatur v. Paulding · State of Iowa v. State of Illinois · New Lamp Chimney Company v. Ansonia Brass and Copper Company

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Any person may, after the expiration of one month and within the next twelve months subsequent to being adjudged a bankrupt, file an application for a discharge in the court of bankruptcy in which the proceedings are pending ; if it shall be made to appear to the judge that the bankrupt was unavoidably prevented from filing it within such time, it may be filed within but not after the expiration of the next six months.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““T.íkIics is measured sometimes by years and sometimes by days, depending on the nature <>E the ease and the circumstances. Hero it was a question of months with the bankrupt. If his order extending his time to tile his application for a discharge was to be attacked by a motion to vacate, the motion should ha^e been made promptly and long enough before the expiration of the 18 months period to enable him to renew his application or lile more proofs in support thereof, assuming the petition to have been insuilicient.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.