Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 195 F.1d 693 - Frick v. Lewis

Frick v. Lewis’s Empirical Analysis

195 F. 693 · 1912

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
December 1972
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 7 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently December 1972

10 federal appellate · 7 district ·

1501912192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

Relationships

Relies on Fong Yue Ting v. United States · Japanese Immigrant Case · Chae Chan Ping v. United States · United States v. Ju Toy · Chin Yow v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Where a fair, though summary, hearing has been given, in ascertaining whether there is or is not any proof tending to sustain a charge involved in a case like this, it is not open to courts to consider either admissibility or weight of proof according to ordinary rules of evidence, even if it believe the proof was insufficient and the conclusion wrong. The question is whether anything was offered that tends, though slightly, to sustain the charge.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “-“Where there is'nothing to support a charge, u>e agree that the department cannot rightfully issue a warrant to deport; for that would he a clear abuse of power."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.