Siniscalchi v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis
195 F. 701 · 1912
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 8 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently June 1938 · most notably Helena Bugajewitz v. Louis Adams D C (1913), Anna Lapina v. William Williams (1914)
14 federal appellate · 8 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Fong Yue Ting v. United States · Japanese Immigrant Case · United States v. Ju Toy · Union Pacific Railway Co. v. Taggart · Chin Yow v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is well settled that officers of the government, to whom the determination of questions of this kind is intrusted under statutes like these governing these proceedings, are not bound by the * i! * evidence applied in courts. It is not enough for a review of their decision on habeas corpus that there was no sworn testimony, or no record of the testimony or of the decision. jSio formal complaint or pleadings are required. The alien’s opportunity to be heard need not be upon any regular set occasion, nor according to the forms of judicial procedure. It may be such as will secure the prompt, vigorous action contemplated by Congress and appropriate to the nature of the case.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ex parte Garcia“.“Considering the summary character of the hearing provided by statute and the rights given to counsel in the rules prescribed, we are not prepared to say that the rules are so arbitrary and so manifestly intended to deprive the alien of a fair, though summary, hearing as to be beyond the power of the Secretary of Commerce and Labor under the authority of the statute.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.