Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 195 F.2d 159 - Jimenez v. Jones

Jimenez v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis

195 F.2d 159 · 1952

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
February 1979
most recently cited

14 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently February 1979

14 federal appellate ·

140195219601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1293 · 48 U.S.C. § 737 · 48 U.S.C. § 872

Relies on Sunal v. Large · Quirin Haupt Kerling Burger Heinck Thiel Neubauer United States Quirin v. Cox Usa 6 · Sunal v. Large · De Castro v. Board of Commissioners · Daniels v. Allen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““More and more we have become convinced that as long as a district court is available, lawyers ought to refrain from presenting a petition of habeas corpus to the judges of this court, either individually or collectively. Not only are the judges of the district courts in a better situation to summon witnesses and hear them, but the decision finally rendered can be reviewed by a full court.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “. . We have no doubt that the Supreme Court of Puerto Rico has full authority to adopt and apply such a rule of practice in the disposition of original petitions for writs of habeas corpus; it is no different in substance from what the Supreme Court of the United States has done. . . .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.