Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 195 F.2d 25 - Stumpf v. Matthews

Stumpf v. Matthews’s Empirical Analysis

195 F.2d 25 · 1951

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
January 1977
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently January 1977

15 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

80195119601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3182

Relies on Tom Tong · Christoffel v. United States · Kabadian v. Doak · Chapman v. Washington Railway & Electric Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When by these rules or by order of this court an act is required or allowed to be done at or within a specified time, the court or a justice thereof for cause shown may (except where the time is also fixed by statute), at any time in the discretion of the court or a justice thereof * * * (2) upon motion permit the act to be done after the expiration of the specified period where the failure to act was the result of excusable neglect.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “* * * although we are obliged to deny the motion for enlargement of time as made under Rule 32(b) (2) on account of alleged excusable neglect, finding the neglect not excusable, we shall, acting under Rule 73(a) and on the court's own motion, extend the time for filing the record for five days after the date of this decision.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.