Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 195 F.2d 361 - Sobel v. Whittier Corp.

Sobel v. Whittier Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

195 F.2d 361 · 1952

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
4
states following
May 2007
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently May 2007 · most notably Bennett v. Gemmill (1977), Industrial Bank of Washington, a Corporation v. Walter N. Tobriner, Commissioners of the District of Columbia, and Theodore J. Scheve (1968)

20 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions

110195219601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hyams v. Calumet & Hecla Mining Co. · Howard v. Wilbur · 95 F. Supp. 643 - Sobel v. Whittier Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Since appellant only asked to restrain the merger, and the order of the district court dismissing the bill of complaint dissolved any such restraint which had theretofore existed by way of a temporary restraining order, and since appellant did not take any steps to preserve the existing status pending appeal, no relief could be here given, since the plan sought to be restrained has already been carried out, and, as heretofore said, the appeal is moot. Hyams v. Calumet & Hecla Mining Co., 6 Cir., 221 F. 529.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.