195 F.2d 523 - Waterman v. Nelson — 195 F.2d 523

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently November 1972

1 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

¶1Corinne C. Waterman, pro se.

¶2Myles J. Lane, U. S. Atty., New York City (Robert Rubinger, Asst. U. S. Atty., New York City, of counsel), for appellees.

¶3Before SWAN, Chief Judge, and CLARK and FRANK, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5This is an appeal from an order of March 3, 1951 dismissing the complaint for want of prosecution. Plaintiff also appeals from an order of May 11 denying her motion to vacate the prior order and to cite for contempt the former United States Attorney and one of his assistants. The case was previously here in 1949. Waterman v. Nelson, 2 Cir., 177 F.2d 965. As appears from that opinion only one of the defendants, Rossell, was then subject to the court’s jurisdiction. None of the others had appeared or been served with process. Nor has any of them yet been served or entered appearance. The complaint was properly dismissed for failure to effect service and prosecute the action. Rule 4(d) (5) and Rule 41(b), Fed.R.Civ.P. 28 U.S.C. As to service upon the United States Civil Service Commission and the Veterans Administration, see Blackmar v. Guerre, 72 S.Ct. 410. Denial of plaintiff’s motions by the order of May 11th was also correct. Both orders are affirmed.