Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

195 F.2d 529

Docket No. 11438.

Kent v. Jacques

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1952-03-14

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1952-03-14

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently March 1991

3 district ·

4019521960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Wm. G. Lavell, Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellant.

Frank G. Millard, Atty. Gen., Edmund E. Shepherd, Sol. Gen., Lansing, Mich., for appellee.

Before HICKS, Chief Judge, and ALLEN and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

This cause was heard upon the transcript of record, briefs and arguments of counsel and upon consideration thereof the Court is of the opinion that there is no reversible error upon the record.

¶2

It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the order appealed from denying a writ of habeas corpus should be and is in all things hereby affirmed.

/195/f2d/529 · .json · Public domain