Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 195 F.2d 717 - Gardner v. Johnson

Gardner v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

195 F.2d 717 · 1952

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
states following
October 2000
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently October 2000 · most notably Salomon v. Kaiser (In re Kaiser) (1983), Payne v. Wood (1985)

8 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

80195219601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Hall · Gordon v. United States · Johnson v. Gardner · Palen v. Palen · Freedman Bros. v. Parker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * that the forms prescribed by the Supreme Court pursuant to the [Bankruptcy] Act required the bankrupt to claim his exemptions in a specific manner, and that the Act provided for a precise mode of setting apart and awarding such claims of exemption. * * * The bankrupt had lost and abandoned any right to a homestead exemption by a failure to schedule and list the same in the manner required by the general orders in bankruptcy.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““The exemption here in question is defined by (Oregon) law. The Bankruptcy Act declares the policy of Congress to give effect to state exemption laws. But once bankruptcy has intervened, the time, manner and conditions under which such exemptions may be claimed as against the trustee are matters of federal law, and are determined by the Bankruptcy Act.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “affirmative steps must be taken, both by the bankrupt and by those administering the bankruptcy estate, before exempt property can be allowed to the bankrupt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.