Ernst v. Clemens

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided March 20, 1952.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1952-03-20

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently January 1964

7 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Ernst v. Clemens

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1952-03-20

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Alan Franklin, Los Angeles, Cal. (J. Calvin Brown, Los Angeles, Cal., of counsel), for appellant.

¶2Herbert A. Huebner, Richard M. Worrel, Fresno, Cal., for appellees.

¶3Before STEPHENS, BONE and ORR, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5We granted a rehearing in this case at which counsel were ■ permitted to expand arguments presented at the original hearing. In our first opinion, 9 Cir., 185 F.2d 231, we noted our reasons for affirming the decision of the lower court. The entire record has been carefully reexamined as a result of which we conclude that our original decision was correct