Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

195 F.2d 779

Docket No. 11182.

Gordon v. Gordon

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued Feb. 26, 1952.

Decided March 13, 1952.

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1952-03-13

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1952-03-13

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently May 1991

2 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

2019521960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1George E. George, Washington, D. C., for appellant.

¶2Harry S. Wender, Washington, D. C., with whom H. Nathaniel Blaustein, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appel-lee.

¶3Before EDGERTON, WILBUR K. MILLER, and PRETTYMAN, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5A separation agreement between a husband and wife provided that the husband was to pay the wife $60 a week for the support of their children during minority. A divorce decree afterwards ordered the husband, in substantially the same terms, to make these payments “during the … minority” of the children. The decree said that it did so “Pursuant to the written Agreement filed herein by and between the parties … It provided “That the Articles of Separation filed herein are hereby adopted and made a part of this decree.” It did not provide, expressly or by necessary implication, that payments would continue to accrue after the husband’s death. In these circumstances we agree with the District Court that they ceased to accrue at his death.

¶6Affirmed.

/195/f2d/779 · .json · Public domain