Daniels v. Souders’s Empirical Analysis
195 F.2d 780 · 1952
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
February 1967
most recently cited
5 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Orvis v. Higgins · Dollar v. Land · Land v. Dollar · Land v. Dollar · Kane v. Kane
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Appellant also contends that the evidence is not sufficient to support the finding that she was guilty of adultery with appellee’s husband. The credibility of the testimony is within the province of the trial court who saw the witnesses and heard them speak. We cannot say that the record did not warrant the inferences and conclusions that were drawn.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.