Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 195 F.3d 1065 - James Lindsey

James Lindsey’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
January 2011
most recently cited

2 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently January 2011

2 district · 2 state decisions

100199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc. · United States v. Lopez · Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp. · Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc. · Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a single, black and white, text-only `tombstone' sign stating, `TOBACCO PRODUCTS SOLD HERE'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “`ultimate touchstone' of preemption analysis.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “In fact, the findings which are included in the Resolution to justify the Board's ban on outdoor tobacco advertising almost exclusively refer to the various health risks that are related to cigarette smoking. Finally, the Resolution is a requirement or prohibition with respect to cigarette advertising because the Resolution expressly prohibits outdoor tobacco advertisements and regulates point of sale availability information. The Resolution is, therefore, preempted by the clear and express language of the FCLAA because it creates a”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.