195 F. Supp. 2d 893 - Gonzalez v. Phillips’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Williams v. Taylor · Gideon v. Wainwright · Kotteakos v. United States · Giglio v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“had insufficient English language abilities to understand the proceedings against him and that his attorney was aware or should have been aware of his . . . limitations.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“depriving [defendant] of an interpreter places his case closer to Cronic than Strickland on the continuum of ineffective assistance of counsel claims”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Pierotti v. Harris“failure to obtain an interpreter [fell] outside the range of reasonably competent professional assistance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.