Huff v. Vilsack’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1471 · 42 U.S.C. § 1485 · 5 U.S.C. § 706 · 7 U.S.C. § 6901 (Department of Agriculture Reorganization Act of 1994) · 7 U.S.C. § 6991 · 7 U.S.C. § 6997 · 7 U.S.C. § 7000
Relies on Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association of United States Inc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Consumer Alert · Norton Secretary of the Interior et al. v. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance et al. · Sykes v. United States · Sykes v. United States · Department of Health & Human Services v. Florida
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“courts retain a role, and an important one, in ensuring that agencies have engaged in reasoned decisionmaking, which means the court must ensure that the decision was based on a consideration of the relevant factors and determine whether there has been a clear error of judgment”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“(internal quotation marks and citation omitted) ). However,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.