Dennis v. Colvin’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

cited by 18 later decisions

March 2019

most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Bowen v. Yuckert · Heckler v. Campbell · Rosa v. Callahan · Berry v. Schweiker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“[A]s a result[,] an ALJ's determination of RFC without a medical advisor's assessment is not supported by substantial evidence.”
18 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. Coleman v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. · Biro v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.
“perfectly correspond with any of the opinions of medical sources cited in his decision.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. Biro v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. · London v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.
“is not qualified to assess a claimant's RFC on the basis of bare medical findings.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. Biro v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. · London v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.