Realvirt, LLC v. Lee’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 35 U.S.C. § 101 · 35 U.S.C. § 102 · 35 U.S.C. § 103 · 35 U.S.C. § 112 · 35 U.S.C. § 145 · 35 U.S.C. § 261
Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co. · Maryland v. Louisiana · Summers v. Earth Island Institute · National Organization for Women, Inc. v. Scheidler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“applicant dissatisfied with the decision of the [PTAB] ... may ... have remedy by civil action against [the PTO]” in the district court. It further provides that “[a]ll expenses of the proceedings shall be paid by the applicant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Realvirt, LLC v. Lee
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.