State v. Stubbs’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 federal appellate · 34 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““. . . the Federal Supreme Court has never said one accused of crime is an incompetent person and entitled to counsel as such at every stage in a criminal proceeding. “No case is cited which states or suggests that counsel must be provided at the investigation stage, or preliminary hearing stage, of a criminal case in Kansas, where the defendant has not requested counsel, has been informed of his rights to counsel, and makes an intelligent waiver, as the appellant did in the case presently before the court.” (p. 824.)”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Call v. State

2. ““. . . Neither Escobedo nor any other decision called to our attention has held that statements or admissions to police officers are inadmissible solely because they are made at a time when the accused did not have counsel. (Latham v. Crouse, 320 F. 2d 120 (10th Cir. 1963), cert. den. 375 U. S. 959 , 11 L. Ed. 2d 317 , 84 S. Ct. 449 ; Otney v. United States, 340 F. 2d 696 (10th Cir. 1965).””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Freeman