Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 195 Kan. 711 - Chance v. State

Chance v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1965

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
June 2024
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2024

19 state decisions

1301965197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on New York Stock Exchange v. Legate · Eastern Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board · State v. Daegele · Ramsey v. Hand · Johnson v. Crouse

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘It has never been the rule in Kansas that a defendant in a criminal action must be appraised by the State prior to conviction that the State intends to invoke the habitual criminal act. The rule followed in (sic) that a person convicted of a felony should ordinarily be timely apprised that an increased sentence will be demanded under the habitual criminal act between the time of the conviction and sentencing, in order that he may show cause, if any he can, why the act should not be invoiced and a higher penalty imposed. . . . The court concludes that petitioner was not prejudiced due to the failure of the State to advise him that the habitual criminal act would be invoked prior to the entry of his plea of guilty, or prior to the day of sentencing.’ ” (p. 715.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “It has never been the rule in Kansas that a defendant in a criminal action must be apprised by the State prior to conviction that the State intends to invoke the habitual criminal act.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.