Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 195 Kan. 718 - Fields v. State

Fields v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1965

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
1
states following
April 1995
most recently cited

36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently April 1995 · most notably State v. Byrd (1969), McCall v. State (1966)

36 state decisions

2401965197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Call v. State · State v. Burnett · Portis v. State · State v. Talbert · Huston v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Under the facts, conditions and circumstances set forth at length in the opinion, and following the numerous decisions therein cited and discussed it is held that an indigent defendant does not have a constitutional right to have an examining magistrate furnish him with counsel for his preliminary hearing. “The well-established rule of this jurisdiction is that any claimed irregularities pertaining to a preliminary examination are deemed to be waived where a defendant enters a voluntary plea of guilty in the district oourt.” (Syl. f ¶ 1, 2.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““. . . we observe that had petitioner’s attorney failed to advise him of a possibility of sentence under the Habitual Criminal Act, the petitioner would have added such failure as an additional ground in his petition.” (1. c. 720.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.