Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 195 La. 1048 - Cerami v. Haas

Cerami v. Haas’s Empirical Analysis

1940

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
July 2012
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently July 2012

17 state decisions

5019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Saunders v. Bolden · Balch v. Young · Lepine v. Marrero · Hutchinson v. Rice · Ryder v. Frost

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"It is well settled in the jurisprudence of this state that written acceptance of a contract or an act of sale is not necessary, but may be established by acts clearly indicating acceptance. In Balch v. Young, 23 La. Ann. 272 , it was said that the law does not require that the acceptance of a contract must be expressed on its face, nor is it essential that the act be signed by the party in whose favor it is made. The acceptance may result from his acts in availing himself of its stipulations, or in doing some act which indicates his acceptance."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.