Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 195 Md. 568 - Stedman v. Hill

Stedman v. Hill’s Empirical Analysis

1950

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
3
states following
May 1991
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently May 1991

9 state decisions

4019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Beall v. White · Coe v. . Hobby · Schaeffer v. Bilger · Gressitt v. Anderson · Gostin v. Needle

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]here the first lease is not so inconsistent and incompatible with the second lease entered into between the same parties for the same term, or part thereof, for the same property, that the two cannot operate together, then the first lease is not rendered null and void, but still subsists, and the second lease is but a modification of the first lease; and in such a case the question of intention is material and relevant....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.