Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 195 MICH 157 - King v. Davidson

King v. Davidson’s Empirical Analysis

1917

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
3
states following
November 1947
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently November 1947

6 state decisions

301917192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Northwestern Iron Co. v. Indusrrial Commission · Weaver v. Maxwell Motor Co. · Limron v. Blair

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In construing this act, its words are to be taken and construed in the sense in which they are understood in common language, taking into consideration the text and subject-matter relative to which they are employed. ’ ’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““In no case shall the amount received for more than one finger, exceed the amount provided in this schedule for the loss of a hand.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.