Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 195 N.C. 233 - Cherry v. . Gilliam

Cherry v. . Gilliam’s Empirical Analysis

1928

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
February 2016
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently February 2016

6 state decisions

401928193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The word `damages' is defined as compensation which the law awards for an injury—'injury' meaning a wrongful act which causes loss or harm to another.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “confers no power on the clerk to make any orders unless the bid is increased.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.