Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

195 N.C. 877

143 S.E 927

State v. . McCall

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 23, 1928

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1928-05-23

Decided 1928-05-23

Per Curiam.

¶1 Defendant assigns as error the failure of the court in its charge to the jury to define the crime of larceny, as charged in the indictment, and also to state in a plain and correct manner the evidence given in the case, and to declare and explain the law arising thereon. C. S., 564. Upon a careful examination of the charge as contained in the case on appeal, served by defendant’s counsel, and accepted by the Solicitor for the State, we must sustain this assignment of error, on the authority of S. v. Eunice, 194 N. C., 409. Defendant is entitled to a

¶2 New trial.

/195/nc/877 · .json · Public domain