Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 195 N.C. App. 562 - File v. File

195 N.C. App. 562 - File v. File’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

13 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 137 N.C. App. 138 - Turner v. Norfolk Southern Corp. · 139 N.C. App. 222 - Brewer v. Brewer · O'Briant v. O'Briant · 149 N.C. App. 475 - Flitt v. Flitt · 151 N.C. App. 622 - McConnell v. McConnell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) state[ ] a clear and specific reconvening time in the order; and (2) the time interval between the two hearings [is not] reasonably brief.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The general rule which has been stated by this Court is that temporary custody orders are interlocutory `and the temporary custody granted by the order does not affect any substantial right of plaintiff which cannot be protected by timely appeal from the trial court's ultimate disposition of the entire controversy on the merits.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[T]he trial court's designation of an order as `temporary' or `permanent' is not binding on an appellate court. Instead, whether an order is temporary or permanent in nature is a question of law, reviewed on appeal de novo.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.