Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 195 N.C. App. 644 - State v. Cortes-Serrano

195 N.C. App. 644 - State v. Cortes-Serrano’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
October 2015
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · State v. Smith · Crane v. Stern · State v. Earnhardt · State v. Hennis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Furthermore, we have previously noted that North Carolina law does not recognize the “continuous course of conduct” theory: In State v. Dudley, 319 N.C. 656, 659 , 356 S.E.2d 361, 363 (1987), the Supreme Court cited with approval language from State v. Small, 31 N.C. App. 556 , 230 S.E.2d 425 (1977): ‘Generally rape is not a continuous offense, but each act of intercourse constitutes a distinct and separate offense.’ The General Assembly has criminalized each act of statutory rape, not a course of conduct. Any changes in the manner in which a course of criminal conduct is punished must come from the legislative branch and not from the judicial branch.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “`The standard of review for this Court assessing evidentiary rulings is abuse of discretion. A trial court may be reversed for an abuse of discretion only upon a showing that its ruling was so arbitrary that it could not have been the result of a reasoned decision.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The standard of review in determining whether a trial court properly denied a motion to suppress is whether the trial court's findings of fact are supported by the evidence and whether its conclusions of law are, in turn, supported by those findings of fact.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.