195 N.C. App. 774 - State v. Rinehart’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
November 2015
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 153 N.C. App. 69 - State v. Pimental · 161 N.C. App. 527 - State v. Jamerson · 151 N.C. App. 136 - State v. Dickson · State v. Wall · 34 N.C. App. 53 - Neasham v. Day
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We are cognizant of the recent opinion in State v. Smith, 193 N.C. App. 739 , 668 S.E.2d 612 (2008), where this Court, relying on State v. Wall, 348 N.C. 671 , 502 S.E.2d 585 (1998), vacated a judgment entered upon the defendant’s guilty plea. However, we find Wall distinguishable from the facts of the present case because the State in Wall had, and exercised, its right to appeal from the judgment; in the present case, defendant has no right to appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.